Niewidzialne zagrożenie: wpływ promieniowania bezprzewodowego na zdrowie

We talk to Dr Kent Chamberlin, president of the Environmental wellness Trust (EHT) and erstwhile Chair of the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at the University of fresh Hampshire, about the impact of modern wireless technologies on human wellness and life.

Kent Chamberlin: Can you tell me a small bit about the news outlet which are you going to publish?

Max Fojtuch: Basically, Institute of Citizen Affairs tries to advance issues which are avoided by the mainstream media.

Perfect! Although I must say it is changing. erstwhile I will tell you my communicative how I got active to give you a small bit more background. I have started 4 years ago giving presentations to the public. So far I I’ve given 70n presentation. A the beginning people got sceptical- “this is not real”, “you’re making it up” – it was then but right now people are a very well aware any of the harms, even the press is beginning to cover it accurately in this country. At the beginning the people were sceptical, the press would not tell the facts.

I am very happy that you express interest on this matters. I fishy that you are a small bit behind?

The subject came out as we have been receiving a increasing number of notifications from Poles around the country that there are any unusual phenomenon, in terms of their well- being, health, dynamics of mobile network towers construction around their facilities or houses. People think that there must be any effect as they started to experience any phenomenon which they never had before.

It was decided by the management of our NGO that it is simply a rather interesting subject so any of our readers, our members and sympathizers have sent letters to the authoritative state institutions which should be liable for that but in many cases the answer was indirect, misleading and fundamentally ignored.

Sounds so acquainted the same situation we have in the USA.

We think that any kind of a grassroot movement is needed to integrate individuals and organisations, occasionally we meet with specialists who share with us their cognition so we can gather any solid information and effort to disseminate topics linked to RMF among general public and policy makers. It is truly tiring subject.

Well… it is 1 which I was battling for a while. I got a presentation which beautiful much answers most of your questions. It gives you truly loads of information. It is simply a slide show- power point show.

Please feel free to print it on your website!

I utilized that slide show during my speaking tours Europe, in the Royal Society of medicine in London. People got rather curious in this topic

When did you announcement that U-turn in perception of the general public?

It is simply a very good question! I truly have noticed that erstwhile I went to the UK. At that time people in USA were a small bit sceptical, then I was invited to the UK, presented to any groups which were very interested, they’ve paid good attention there was a good turn out on the events, they’ve asked good questions. I would say it was around June 2023. It is simply a reasonably fresh thing, although yesterday (28^th February 2025) we had a bill going forward in our state to prevent a wholesale regulation out 5G towers in the fresh Hampshire state. People from telecom manufacture came and testified- spread lies, I was beautiful much shocked to see that.

People in Poland effort to get authoritative answers to respective questions linked to mobile networks companies and implementation of fresh mobile phones. It seems that any of government powers have been transferred to the European Union Commission (Brussels) which is liable for execution of the same legislations within all EU states regarding the telecom industries.

Many users of old models of mobile phones say that it seems to be unfair that by law they are obliged to quit old phones of 2G generation as according to them these phones are much better in all aspect of the fresh ones (batteries lasting longer, no request to usage smartphone, etc.)

Do you know the reason? It is simply money, the companies are very greedy. erstwhile they keep advancing technology they force you to acquisition a fresh equipment and that equipment is not a inexpensive one. You are right, there is no reason why we should not usage our old cell phones.

It is just happened to me. I had a smartphone- iPhone SE- it was fine, it was in a large condition. I took a good care of it. I did what I wanted to do- utilizing GPS, making telephone calls, texting and then I was to told you gotta replace it. This model of iPhone won’t be supported anymore. It all about money- it is simply a greedy industry. They do not care about your health. They care about their profits.

I don’t want to sound conspiratorial but that how it is.

People do not know but yearly energy costs of supplying 1 mobile network tower is highly high. We are being told that utilizing advanced tech in energy efficient like we are saving money now alternatively of flying to you to meet you in individual ( it would be enjoyable) but the power usage for advanced tech is higher than the airline industry. The aviation sector has 2% in carbon footprint in the planet and the advanced tech is about 3%. So telecoms don’t want you to know that 5G is truly a energy hog.

Most of the power to run our telecom infrastructure comes from atomic power stations or from dams from hydro power.

How do you get your information?

I can talk to you about any aspect of radiation and how it effects chaotic life, humans, I can talk about politics. I can tell you all these things and tell you why I know it. It is crucial as you request to concern your source. Who is telling me this? Am I any extremist or a individual with any chaotic ideology?

Maybe the best thing for me now is to have an active presentation with you. I can show you my slides and explain the meaning of each slide. You and I will be there to talk about it. This is not a lecture, it is an chance to discuss the content.

This is the 1^st side. I just came back from California where we blocked towers as local authorities wanted to put them around the children. And that is absolutely not right. erstwhile I started this 5 years ago, erstwhile I got active in this, I was a prof. and president of the Department of Electronics and Computer Engineering at the University of the fresh Hampshire. My speciality area is biomechanical engineering and radio frequency engineering. I was working with antennas, electromagnetics, radiation my full career. And frankly saying I thought that wireless radiation which you get from your cell telephone was absolutely safe. The reason I thought that is that the manufacture through our trade organisations the Institute for electrical and Electronics Engineers which is most likely the biggest trade organisation in the world, and they were periodically coming up with articles saying that people were claiming that 5G was harmful but it is absolutely not and the remainder of the article would be why they thought it was the case.

I believed in it. Then, due to my background I was asked to service on the state commission, I will say a small bit more about it in a moment.

Once I started serving on this commission I started to do investigation I discovered that wireless radiation is very harmful. There is simply a conflict of interest. I think that everybody you had perceive to should say would say that this conflict maybe. I have served on the commission and I do feel work to people and groups like yours to get word out. So you can take what I am saying now, let people know about it I will accomplish my mission. I am talking to you right now as citizen of 1 country who speaks to a citizen of another country.

The reason this commission got formed, I live in the state of fresh Hampshire, was that legislators were being told by their constituents (people who voted them in) that they have been harmed by the wireless radiation and they didn’t want to have any more regulation out of systems like 5G. And yet, the same legislators have been told by the telecom industry, that they needed to have more facilities and that wireless radiation was completely harmless, did not hurt you at all. So it was decided to form a commission. The government was wrote here you will find a hyperlink which will take you to this peculiar case. So they wrote bipartisan government which had to pass in both houses. The legislator had to sign, the politician had to sign it. It was a large deal.

The legislative said what kind of expertise you gotta have in this commission. I took about a year to get this through government which was beautiful good. 1 thing which underlies this is that government can not keep up with technology. This is simply a 1 problem which we deal with.

But we did, we ended up with the commission. In a final analysis we had 13 members- experts from variety of specialisations like medicine, physics, electromagnetics ( that’s me) , epidemiology, statistics, occupational health, public wellness policy.. We got all expertise we needed to answer the questions which have been asked.

Did you have any experts from a business side like mobile network providers?

Yes. We got experts from CTIA (Cellular Telecommunication Industries Association). The government asked us questions. 1 of the question, most likely a top one, was why the insurance companies admit the wireless radiation as a hazard but it will not insure for harm and harm. Not even Lloyds of London will insure against wireless radiation. They say it is harm but they will not insure against it. Another thing- why hundreds of peer review studies show harm from wireless radiation which was totally ignored by our national Communication Commission- why the guidelines are based solely on thermal effect? You know erstwhile you toss something in a microwave its runs on the same frequency as wireless you put it under advanced power and it will warm up. FCC and manufacture claim that is the only harm you get from radiation. Low frequency stuff does not bother them at all which is of course wrong.

Why planet wellness Organisation classifies wireless radiation as possible human cancerogenic B2 cancerogenic and this fact is completely ignored by FCC – so what is going on there? It was in government which has formed the state commission which addressed these questions to us.

We looked in quite a few peer review publications and commission vetted, due to the fact that we all know that not all peer reviewed articles are accurate. So what we did as a commission, we looked at the articles which were brought before us and we made certain that they were accurate as I am beautiful good in that. I got experience as an associated editor for IEEE transactions which is simply a very large publication so I am acquainted with this that way and as department chair in technology I am acquainted how to look at the article and look at the publication to find out is there quality or not. There is junk discipline (very low quality). There are truly low quality journals up there. Sometimes they are referred as predatory journals due to the fact that they let their members to public but they charge quite a few money, so sometimes erstwhile faculty members request publications they go to predatory journals- these junk discipline journals and they pay money to get published, but nobody pays attention to these journals due to the fact that it is simply a junk science.

I want to say that I was working with our college librarian. She is PhD in librarian discipline and I work with her to identify a quality articles. I want to make it clear that we went through a vetting process for the material we consider in the commission. We studied over a year. We besides got information relating to the national Communication Commission, Food Drug Administration, Environmental Protection Agency, we invitation them to meet with us. The invitation was very formal, issued by the state commission, legislation, sign by our politician but they did not come to visit not even virtually. They truly wouldn’t supply information- they totally ignored us! Their behaviour was for us a valuable part of information. Why? You will find out in a moment. We brought outside, global experts on impact of wireless radiation on health.

We brought them outside experts in, all these global experts, for once, were providing a clear evidence that wireless radiation. All these 9 experts but 1, were providing a clear evidence that wireless radiation causes a harm and is simply a human and environmental threat. There was 1 presenter who didn’t admit the that hazard and it was, I presume you can guess, it was a guy from telecom manufacture and he was the only individual who was paid to present.

So manufacture was paid to these guys, we call them hired guns, mostly they don’t have a adequate background to make claims they claimed. They origin a small bit of uncertainty in people’s minds. These guys were a origin of information for our commission, we truly took a deep dive. What was the outcome?

Hundreds of publications show you the harm caused by low frequency radiation exposure, whether the cell tower, the cell phone, radar, WIFI in your home, baby monitors, you name it, they identify the harms. We didn’t hunt for these articles. Most of peer reviews articles show the effects from that exposure.

I’ve heard manufacture claim many times the only articles which show harm of wireless radiation are those “cherry picked” from French journals. Definitely not from French journals, these are top tier review journals with faculty, researchers from top tier institutions. Most of them suggested that they weren’t “cherry picked” at all. Majority of publications that look at the issue like life oxidative stress show that there are problems.

People ask what is the mechanics for harm. Well, 1 of main is oxidative stress which creates free radicals in your body. Oxidative stress causes harm and many illnesses. Being exposed to wireless radiation increases level of free radicals in your body what leads to long list of diseases.

Reproductive damage- if you take sperm and divide it into 2 test tubes and 1 of them you exposure to wireless radiation and second 1 not you will announcement a difference in terms of vitality, mortality- overall quality of the sperm.

This is only 1 example but there are hundreds of technological articles about the negative impact of wireless radiation on human body and health.

Now, you can ask me if there is simply a link between wireless and those diseases would you anticipate an increase in those illnesses since wireless radiation affects more people?

Here we go: Alzheimer’s death rate skyrocketed per 100 1000 people since year 2000- it more than doubled. By the way, I have not made this stuff up. It comes from Alzheimer website where that data was published.

Lets look at something else, have a look at diabetics in the USA in 2004. By 2012 there is simply a immense increase. What has happened between 2004 and 2012? In 2007 iPhone came out. Since then we got more and more exposure.

As you may know in the USA loads of information has been taken off from net for organisations like the Centre for Diseases Control (CDC), it has been purged and we are looking for another places where it could be located. As you can see between 2004 and 2019 we can observe a profound increase in kind 2 diabetics.

Let look at brain tumours. There are not essential malignant and there are tumours which can kill you. This data is from Danish Cancer Registry, again you see doubling of tumours rates since 1995.

You can see tumours affect more women than men. There are many abnormalities which I am not able to explain.

Parkinsons diseases – I got friends who developed this illness at the rate which truly surprises me.

This data was get from the Lancet- it is simply a medical journal. You can see that from year 2000 the rate climbs hugely.

There is simply a increasing number of diseases which increased in fresh years.

What can origin them? Let have close look at the network density. This is in the USA, erstwhile you go back to 2004 there were not so many networks around. Sometimes you had to go to hunt for a network to make a wireless telephone call. In 2008 a major increase, again in 2012- it is simply quite a few coverage, yet in 2019- 6 years ago and you barely can find places which don’t have coverage.

It shows that definitely there is simply a corelation between any diseases and vulnerability to wireless radiation.

Whether is simply a origin people effort to debate, but there is simply a good, strong evidence that it is simply a cause- vulnerability to wireless radiation does origin the diseases which I have linked.

Look at the impact of wireless radiation on DNA . I got here study written by 12 technological institutions in 7 different countries which have analysed single cell gen electrophoresis- so you put a part of DNA, don’t exposure it to anything, you just run it through the common acid and you get a good symmetric image. Then if you exposure this DNA to chest X-rays (ionizing radiation) which, as we know, will origin the harm, you get this. That is to be expected.

What people did not anticipate what you exposure DNA to mobile phone? You can see here 24 hours mobile telephone vulnerability and you see the same kind of harm to the DNA as ionizing radiation. It is beautiful convincing.

What about exposing people? What we know about that?

If you go to California in 2004 individual thought it would be a large thought to put cell towers on or close fire stations. It makes sense from engineering stand point. It is truly easy. If you think about police department or fire department you think of people who are physically robust. You think about people who are not likely to complain.

What happened erstwhile they put these towers in? After the telecom companies put towers in and turned them on, within a week of installation, many fire fighters have developed different symptoms of headache, fatigue, insomnia, memory loss, confusion, nausea and weakness. 1 fire fighter who was on a work in a station located very close to the cell tower has forgotten CPR and another fire fighters got lost while responding to fires in the city they were working.

It has a very profound impact. It was specified a strong substance that fire fighters through their trade unions were able to put provision preventing these facilities for being placed close their stations. You should remember that American fire fighters and I fishy the same thing is in Poland will spend days (3-4 days) in the station. Maximum vulnerability is like 5% of the FCC units per limit 33.35. It is inactive reasonably strong vulnerability but it is well below the limit so it should be safe. You may say OK, that happened, loads of the symptoms you are naming happened to us erstwhile we drink besides much, while we are drinking, or erstwhile we drink besides much coffee but it was replicable in the laboratory. If you go to the laboratory and exposure people to the same kind of thing you get the same kind of experience.

Let have a look at the rate of deaths due to cancer for people surviving close to cell towers. This was done back in Brazil between 1996-2006 and the reason, it is good in my opinion, we are looking at only the impact of cell telephone towers due to the fact that most of people in Brazil at that time didn’t have their own cell phones. It is not like you are looking at t the effect of their own electronics. You look only at the effect of a cell tower. We are looking at the large number of cancer deaths. 7000 cancer deaths of people who lived close 800 towers. erstwhile you do studies of this kind you want to have a large and a large number of people so you can get statistical difference and assurance in the results. You get that in this study! Researchers looked at cancer deaths, so if individual died of cancer they would find out where they lived with a cell tower and then find a cancer rate for those people.

Another thing to point out is the maximum vulnerability level for the survey was little than 5% of the FCC guidelines. We are not talking about large exposures but vulnerability over a long period of time. The results are shown in red colour for individuals who died from cancer with a distance from a cell tower, what is in blue is the cancer rate for population in general. As you expect, if you get further distant from the cell tower the cancer rate adds any toes to 36.22 population cancer rate in general.

If you live closer and closer to the cell tower the likelihood that you will die from cancer increases compare to population in general.

The same things happen over 5G infrastructure just a small bit different, but in general if you get closer to the cell tower the probability of getting harm from wireless radiation is greater. But it is not the only thing. It is not the only survey which was made about people surviving next to the cell towers. There were 38 erstwhile studies and 17 performed meta-analysis, and these studies show akin effect for surviving next to the cell tower.

If you live greater than 500 meters from a cell tower it seems to be a reasonable cut off distance for adverse wellness effects. Still, if you go back and look at 500 meters, I inactive would not like to live there, the harm would be greater than for population in general.

You should live more than 1 kilometre distant from a cell tower which is almost impossible.

Keep in head that I am reporting the findings of the Commission not my theory. We came up with the value of distance people should live distant from the cell towers, we thought we could sale (another words it would reasonable, it would be protective and it would be accepted by the telecom industry), of course it wasn’t. The manufacture said no, they wanted to be right on the tops of people homes. We were not able to pass legislation.

Here you can see how the guidelines have been set. The limits of wireless radiation have been set up in 1980 and were based on 1 hr behavioural studies on 8 rats and 5 monkeys. Additional studies have been conducted since then but the findings in this first survey had held and that’s what’s been utilized on us today. This was done well before mobile phones era. It is crazy I know! Any time I show this slide I am shocked by it!

Their presumption was in these studies that the only harm you can get will be heat you up! It is the only harm. They didn’t request long word tests to find out the problem not at all. The short terms effects were the only ones they needed to look at.

The way this survey worked in 1980s that they had these rats and monkeys which were food deprived during the start of survey and animals have been trained to push the level to get any food. You put hungry animals into a cage, push the level for food, but for the survey they did the same thing- animals were deprived of food and they kept turning power up. Romping up the RMF vulnerability until the animals couldn’t execute their simply tasks of pushing the lever to get more food. Thet declared it as a threshold for exposure. any of the monkeys got burns on their faces from that exposure, they just couldn’t function any longer, heat exhaustion…The researches just said that it. Then they took this value and divided by what they call “safety factor” of 50 and that is how they come up with the vulnerability threshold which are in place present for you and me.

Before erstwhile I was talking about 5% of over FCC limits- this is what I was talking about.

It is absolutely insane and with this arbitrary “safety factor” they didn’t have any mark in terms comparative risk, not at all! It was just arbitrary. So American authorities are utilizing origin of 10 for workers. It is totally amazing for me. Right now guidelines for the vulnerability which you and I we are getting (lifetime exposures) are based on studies which lasted 60 minutes or less, single end point, in behavioural studies you look at temperature, at mini aspects of animal you are doing survey on.

In this case they were looking only whether or not animals were able to push the level to get food.

8 rats, 5 monkeys these are very tiny samples. The short word studies are absolutely meaningless if you look at long-term vulnerability unless we choice something which was beautiful robust- I can give you a full lecture about the chaotic life exposure.

Here you got a cell mast and 465 feet distant there is simply a tree, back in 2008 it looked beautiful good. 7 years later in 2015 you can see the degradation on the left side of the tree and yet in 2019 they had to cut the tree down. This is not a 1 time off example. They are loads of these. They have looked at hundreds of trees. Different trees have different responses to RMF radiation. Most of them are harmed.

I want to point out on this slide what is encircled- left side of the tree is on 0.03% of the FCC limits. It is simply a very tiny percent of the guidelines and inactive you are getting damage.

So if you live close the cell tower what impact it will have on you over time? It won’t be a death rate which origin death instantly. The point is if it were a technological issue we all be in agreement.

We would come to a conference, presented our data, all of this would be a consecutive line across. We all had the same values for exposure. In fact it is so different due to the fact that we had different degrees of lobbying, different level of penetration of telecom manufacture to our government, another countries. If you get a country which is truly curious in protecting its citizens like Switzerland, we know they are, they have far lower vulnerability guidelines than USA has and we have the highest. It is amazing. India is under pressure, they may change, they may go up where we are and its due to the fact that the manufacture is so powerful.

I am not so certain about Russia, Italy and Switzerland, but we are proceeding about the pressures which are on in another countries to rise the limits.

The question which we ask in the commission is “OK you have these very advanced 10Watts/sq.m. it is simply a crucial amount of exposure”- how much vulnerability do you request to have a robust telephone call? Here is the answer with an example. Here is the case where I was brought on here you can see the antenna which was boosting the mobile signal right into a school. The parents has asked me to answer respective questions. I went there with a signal metre called “safe and sound pro”- I don’t know if it is available in Poland. What you can see they got there 18.000 microwatts per metre square which is 0.8% of the FCC limit. Do you request that strong signal to download videos and watch movies, make telephone calls? The answer is NO! To have 4-5 signal bars on your telephone you request only 6 microwatts per metre square. It is 1/1000000 of the FCC limit. To get just a good signal of 3 bars you request you will request 6 nanowatts and 1 nano is simply a billion of the Watt per metre square. Tiny, tiny signal is what you request and frankly for my iPhone SE to downloads videos with only 2 signal bars.

What we are looking at here is origin due to the fact that if manufacture goes in an they put a cell tower in the mediate of populated area and turn up the power to allowable maximum then they get a large coverage for their investment. So it is the substance of profit. I can tell you as a radio frequency engineer you can position tower in specified a way that you do not exposure people to excessive radiation and you inactive can get a large coverage. The best way would be to install in a given area many cell towers with much lower signal power or you can decision the towers distant from the town into agrarian areas where you don’t have a advanced density of population and aim energy with direction antenna in to the populated areas with mediocre reception. There are solutions. I know it from my own professional experience. I have done loads of tower siting in my career.

The question which we have been asking as the commission why is the national Communication Commission not providing us with better guidelines how to defend ourselves. Remember, they didn’t come to meet with us but we were wondering what was going on?

Here is the answer: this is simply a word (I am not certain are you acquainted with that, we were not familiar) “captured agency”. How the national Communication Commission is dominated by the industries which it presumably regulates. This is not from any conspiracy explanation website. It comes from the Harward University Centre for Ethics. They are saying that manufacture controls the FCC through nuts stranglehold that extends from its well-placed run spending in legislature through its control of the FCC‘s Congressional oversight committees to its persistent agency lobbying.” Thay what is going on! You have people revolving door, people run FCC, then they go run manufacture like CTIA, then they go back to run FCC and this study details how it happens. This is the fact that the manufacture has taken the government. It is simple as that! In that study they show that the manufacture uses the playbook any of which was utilized by large tobacco, getting quite a few money together, doing lobbying, paying for campaigns.

When you are most likely the highest profit manufacture on this planet you spend loads of money to be certain that your profits are not being jeopardized. That’s what they are doing. Mobile phones manufactures, mobile network operators they are all together. They all are members of CTIA. This is their trade group. The manufacture pays crucial dues to their CTIA, so CTIA will lobby on their behalf. That’s what we have seen before. erstwhile you get loads of money you may buy scientists to say things like this.

Arguably, do cigarettes origin the cancer? Only 1 in 6 life time smokers gets lung cancer. Is it proven that a cigaret causes the cancer? any people inactive say NO! If 100% would get cancer then people say yes it has proven, but it takes a while to prove something actually.

What we are trying to do with environmental trust is to make people aware of the wireless radiation harm, knowing about comparison with smoking and then get manufacture to compete on safety. At the minute the manufacture completely denies any harm associated with their phones and networks despite that crystal clear discipline it says otherwise.

We hope to compete the telecom manufacture on safety the same like car industries did. Think back at the days, erstwhile you didn’t have safety glassing in cars. You didn’t have padded dashboards, no seat belts nor airbags.

So many things have been done what make automobile safer. It was beautiful apparent even then they made improvement in safety but manufacture fought those measures.

Do you have cognition about businesses which are trying to go against that current which is in this industry?

Yes. I have met with car manufacturers who are looking behind the horizon and see the possible issue. In another words, making cars which have lower radiation in a cockpit. It is an issue with electrical vehicles, due to the fact that they have these advanced current engines so are there ways to shield against that and shielding people against their own cell phones. But it costs money.

What about cell phones manufacturers?

They work together. I can see the situation erstwhile you take your cell telephone and put it in a closed device in a closure. You can then communicate with your cell phone, which would communicate to the outside. Don’t want to go to details but there are plenty of ways of making this happen. So, what is going inside the vehicle is burden lower radiation. I can talk a lot about that…. What we should talk about ways to reduce radiation in a cell phone, we can do the same what is going on for a car.

Wireless infrastructure lowers the marketplace value of properties a lot in any cases. Wireless infrastructure can prone to serious fire hazards. any very bad fires we had in California have been caused by telecom facilities.

Was it proven?

Yes. Cables broken loose and you got arching and it causes fires. They are very poorly design. They usage quite a few power as we pointed out earlier. Telecom infrastructure needs loads of power to run it and quite a few possible for fire. If it is battery operated it is not a large problem, but erstwhile it uses quite a few advanced power then it will be more fire hazard.

I was working with the Department of Justice making a survey about the safety of the cell towers in terms of communication during the emergency.

1 of the problems is that cell towers are known to saturate during the emergency due to the fact that what people do erstwhile there are emergencies? They catch their cell phone. So cell towers saturate and can not be utilized longer for communication.

People do not realize how easy it is to jam the cell towers. I don’t want to get to details about it right now.

Regarding this issue I have a question. As you know Poland hosts many refugees from Ukraine. On respective occasions I had chats with people who came to Poland from war affected areas of Ukraine.

They told me they thought that WiFi transmitter tower can dramatically improve geolocation of a combat drone, a rocket or a flying bomb to hit particular, chosen destination. Can you say something about it?

Yes. It is truth. I can tell you the discipline behind it but is another story…

What I advocate and I hope your Institute will advocate is to usage wired connection where possible. At schools, at work places. Right now I chat with you via fibreoptic connection to my computer. fibre optics is blindly fast, I can talk about a lot, too. That is my recommendation. I usage ethernet I never had to replace anything, it is much faster that any wireless option which will always become available. It is much more robust.

As I say there things which can be done to mitigate the problems associated with wireless radiation.

I would like to contact upon additional issue. Here is simply a business model why telecom manufacture wants to put 5G everywhere. This is the only reason they want to usage it for. Most of the households are connected to the ethernet- I presume the same is in Poland. You get wired net service supplier called ISP- they supply cable, fibreoptic and twisted pair which goes to each phone. It is great! It works! But what telecom companies want is to put these 5G towers beautiful regularly and to usage the same devices to supply net to those towers which we are having going to our homes. So they want to take them from our homes. Look at these tv towers and then what they can do they can sale these small devices called “5G over internet”, you go to your Verizon (US mobile network operator), T- mobile, Vodafone store, you buy this small box- it is simply a tiny box with 1 plug on it. You bring it home, you plug it in and that box connects to net the 5G connection and it will supply Wi-Fi in your home. It is convenience due to the fact that you don’t request to deal with net service supplier anymore. You can say “bye-bye” to them and at the beginning it looks like it is going to be little expensive, due to the fact that internets service supplier (5G home internet) will sale these devices at very low rate, charging a low monthly fee for it, but what happens it will give them a monopoly. certain adequate in future they will rise the prices.

Besides paying them monthly it will give you vulnerability as these devices are jammable, very jammable, just google put in “cell telephone jammer” you will get a full host of them, they are not expensive. You can buy these jammers and what burglars are doing, they go to those homes which have wired safety devices and they put these jammers and safety devices no longer work, they go to rob these houses, they leave the home and take jamming device of and people have no evidence what happed in their home.

We are coming to conclusion of my lecture. Here is the study of the Commission I have served on. You can see the final study there. It is 390 pages, you’ve got an essence of that just in first 20 pages or so.

Wireless radiation does pose a crucial threat to human wellness and environment. Electro hypersensitivity syndrome (EHS)- it is simply a real thing affecting 3-5% of population which can’t be around operating wireless devices.

What happens to individuals who endure from electro hypersensitivity, how they live all day life?

They can not go anywhere, they can not operate any electronic devices. I know these people, they are real. It is not made up. You can be around them but you must control off the cell telephone before you go to see them.. They have no wireless connections in their homes. If you enter their premises with your telephone you turn it on they will instantly feel it. They instantly get sick. They get headaches, sometimes they vomit, the impact of wireless radiation is very bad on them. This thing is going to increase in this planet over time due to the fact that it is like with air contamination and asthma. If you are in a very low air polluted area you will have comparatively low incidents of asthma , but if you increase the background of contamination you will get higher and higher level of people who will live with these symptoms.

What is happening now is that we are getting exposure to greater and greater doses of radiation. Over time percent of people experiencing EHS is going to increase. Of course till that time as it happens we are going to have the infrastructure in place and erstwhile it is in place you won’t get in removed. It is besides much cash, besides much profit incentives for telecom industry…

Do you think it will be obligatory to install these fresh devices?

It is legislation, that what business is doing right now in the USA. They will force you to have towers close your home and people fight it. Sometimes they win. That is 1 of reasons I go to places like these, I travel around to give these presentations due to the fact that the telecom manufacture is able to put towers as people don’t know about the harms until it is besides late.

They are people like you who know about the harms a head of time, then they ask me can I give a presentation like 1 I am just giving to you. They hear that presentation and then they fight it.

We make recording of the presentation in a given area, they make it available on YouTube, and erstwhile people can see it they open arms and that is simply a grassroot movement you have mentioned. You will not get anywhere at state or national level due to the fact that they bail out. We get attraction at grass root level. Local politicians will act on this erstwhile adequate people will rise up with petitions, affidavits, meetings.

That is the only way I see we scope much attraction. I have tried implement legislation, testified, but it is just meaningless, due to the fact that manufacture has so much money that they have purchased our government.

It is not a technological issue nor safety issue it’s a political issue.

Remember this presentation is formal fresh Hampshire State Commission on 5G findings, which includes of course my own and unbiased experts- we get expertise which telecom manufacture does not have.

Where did you find them?

They found me!!! I think that these individuals are civic minded, I am a chair of a school board- I am not paid for it. The same for being unpaid for serving on the commission. It feels that you can do something for your country and for your fellow human being. That is why I did it. I have spent many, many, many hours working on the commission as did others who served on the commission. It is just we feel- hey! Here is something incorrect and possibly in my tiny way I can make a change and I am going to service on this commission. And I did. Since being on the commission I have made, as mentioned earlier, over 70 presentations to people like you, then I went to groups, I have done in person, I have done it to tiny groups, I have met with politicians, mayors of cities and it seems it does have an impact erstwhile people hear my story.

More educated people are more curious they are ready to perceive to my message they realize the science. It makes sense for them, we request to get protection against it. In another places where is little education, people are swived by money so erstwhile telecom company comes to present to them and possibly offer them to compensate any way ( in the way I don’t want to get into right now) people fall for it. They say OK. All let them in. I, let say, as individual in a political position to all install cell towers so the people who do approval say it is easy due to the fact that it is easier for people who service on for example in city councils to simply say yes to a licence than to deny it. due to the fact that if they deny there may be political ramifications, possibly the cell manufacture may be after them.

It takes courage to fight something as large and powerful as telecommunication industry.

I leave people with this. If you are in position to halt a tower- do it! This is your civic responsibility. I am here for what I see as my civic work but if you are in the position of power to prevent these towers from going in- do it!

As you can see I have much more materials. Have a look to my appendix. There is simply quite a few information on it.

I am a president of the Environmental wellness Trust- global NGO, we are trying and we do co-ordinate people around the world, we have the best actions with people in Canada, United Kingdom, France, Belgium, the Netherlands, so we have a small bit of that. We would be very receptive in working with people around including more people in our oral so to speak.

Do you have any message to Polish people from your point of view as individual who has been active for so long in these issues?

Yes. I do! keep yourself active and you request to be proactive. I am not certain about your laws, but to put a cell tower in the USA you request to let people who will live next to the towers. People must be aware where the towers will go and simple they must fight these installations. It takes quite a few effort to fight these towers. We had truly good luck with giving presentation like this one. People got angry, they had protests, they go to municipal, city council meetings, they go there in large numbers of people. They wear the same colour t-shirts, so it is clear what their view is: NO TOWERS! Sometimes you can buy these t-shirts. Politicians erstwhile they see that they realize that we deal with a grassroots movement. There is simply a way of doing that, we are beautiful good in making it happen. We receive a expanding request to aid people to do that?

Are you prosecuted for your actions at the state or national level?

What we are doing we are looking for government and as it comes alone. It is usually telecom manufacture trying to make it easier for them put the facilities. Even if people protest- they don’t want it, telecoms inactive put towers in. We keep an eye on that, we do meet with legislators, we are active in gathering with people. As it was pointed out earlier it seems to do any good.

Our politicians spend 70% of their time to get money to fund their next electoral campaign. They are not there to aid us. erstwhile I talk to these legislators about these issues, their eyes glaze over. What are you talking about?! They have no thought about the issues. It seems that you have any background. You seem to realize what I am trying to talk about! I ask very good questions but erstwhile I talk to legislators they don’t know this stuff nor do their advisers. They have a squad of people who aid them to realize issues like this so they can better vote on this but truly it does not substance nowadays.

It is all just about can you supply me with money- if you can’t then……

That’s what we are doing now, dealing with getting the best traction at the grassroots level. We are putting effort at the advanced (federal) level or state level- yesterday (27^th March 20025) individual tried to pass the government and manufacture just comes in and says- there is no issue, there is no harm and you request to put these towers in so you can be competitive. It only means they can by only more profitable. That is all they are trying to do. People fall for it. That is the only side they are proceeding due to the fact that the manufacture can bring these people like yesterday they brought 2 individuals from the Cellular Communication Industries Association, they brought them across the country. They paid them very well. For me I am just a lone voice “hey- this stuff is harmful”- nobody pays me for going around to give these presentations so it is very hard to compete against that.

What about the educational authorities at the state or national level? Are they curious in any campaigns to advance your awareness program?

It is simply a large question and the answer is yes- we are working on it. Me, who is serving at the state commission on the wellness impact, is simply a chair in the school board, I have worked with department of education before, now we are planning a run . We will go in to aid with policies which schools can implement to lower the radiation vulnerability to the students. There is simply a lot schools can do. It may costs money but we will low the exposures.

Education is simply a immense gateway due to the fact that if you can go to schools, students will start admit what is going on, then erstwhile they become adults things will change. quite a few students know it already. Their parents are aware of the problem as their kids will go to find out there are certain places where they can seat in a schoolroom which give them headaches if they seat around the wireless router or going to any rooms without having a headache. We hear the same thing from teachers, any teachers through their trade union are trying to bring a suit against their school to supply them accommodation (American disability accommodation act) for their wireless sensitivity.

Many American states presently are abandoning usage of smartphones at schools.

What average individual can do to defend him/herself from radiation? Are there any remedies, plants which could be utilized to minimalize a negative impact of radiation?

What I say people is to get a metre that measures the radiation exposure. What we’ve done in our country is simply a programme which provided meters to libraries at very reduced costs. People can go to their library and check out the metre just the same they can check out a book. By making it available, they can go through their homes to find out where the hotspots are. Sometimes it is amazing how hard it is to acquisition an appliance, nowadays, which does not have any form of wireless built- in to it. It does not cost manufacture a much of all but it is simply a selling point.

Sensitive people got sometimes amazed erstwhile they buy a fresh refrigerator or oven and they find that erstwhile they plug in, all of the sudden, they are being sensitize and it is adequate to trigger them.

If you get a metre you can figure out where the vulnerability coming from and then you can navigate.

Put a metre under the pillow of your kids- you don’t want have anything what is bigger than 10 microwatts per squared meter. If you observed the value bigger than that you decision around, decision the bed around, find out where the exposures come from. If it is from a neighbour possibly ask him to decision his wireless device.

You may get any equipment which may shield you from that vulnerability like wall paintings but the problem is that they may reflect radiation so if individual does go to the area like that and turns his cell telephone and a signal spreads around and then it increases your exposure. So as long as nobody will you the cell telephone in that painted area then it makes sense.

Please remember, a the minute the business is driving things, but there are solutions. 1 is do you truly request to download a movie in seconds to your device? In my opinion 5G was a incorrect way to go. Button line is that the manufacture has accumulated all these money and you never just seat on money. They gotta spend them any where. They decided to spend it on 5G and fresh technology.

If you stay with 4G, and now you decision cell towers a small bit, did any techniques I have mentioned earlier, you will get a large coverage for making telephone calls. It will work. If you put wired connections within your homes or even something with is known as a LiFi- it is simply a modulate light to get a signal, to get information. Why not usage that?

In schools, for example, why WiFi is utilized not LiFi? You can buy a device that does it, that works, it is like a router and its sends down the light information, you plug in you dongle at it does the same thing as WiFi.

What is the reason that LiFi is not promoted?

It is reasonably new, it is somewhat costly and they are inactive working on it, as far as I know. You can buy a LiFi/ afi it is available, it may have any bugs, which you request to work out, but it works. Another thing you can do in schools is to put circular tables (circular) with small plugs, you put quite a few students around them with their computers and all of them are wired. It is very low radiation. It would not cost all that much to do.

We have solutions, the solutions which would not cost much. I mean if we put in WiFi to begin with (which was beautiful expensive), why we can’t find alternatives to it? Just go back to wiring which was, is most likely inactive at schools. It is Ethernet. most likely it is inactive there. Just go for it and usage it. I did it in my home as shortly I have discovered it. I have stopped utilizing wireless and switched to Ethernet.

What mobile telephone are you utilizing at the moment?

I get iPhone SE I am utilizing WiFi calling. Go to settings, go to cellular and scroll down a small bit and you will see WiFi calling as being an option. You turn it on and that way whenever having problem with receiving the mobile network signal it goes to WiFi calling. It is crucial and significant. The transmitter in your device has maximum of 3 watts. Ito works perfectly that what I do. In WiFi Calling mode you usage much lower power transmitter. erstwhile you are going to be at you home or in a building at work and you have access to the WiFi network, usage that alternatively while it will usage much lower power- like 1/30 of exposure.

There are loads of solutions and as a radio frequency engineer I know these solutions due to the fact that I worked in this area. Why you have not utilized that mode before? Why your telephone automatically does not do that? Nobody told you about it? You shouldn’t be told. Your device should automatically choice up WiFi calling mode it the telephone detects WiFi network.

Max Fojtuch